 |
Interoperability of Databases for Development and
Manufacturing
of Advanced Inorganic Materials
Principal Investigator:
Vicky Lynn Karen (301) 975-6255
vicky.karen@nist.govObjectives:
-To enable rapid materials development for
advanced manufacturing applications by using semantic theory and design as a
basis for database interoperability to provide access to data describing the
structure, stability, and properties of inorganic materials.
-To provide a unified crystal-structure database containing both metallic and
non-metallic inorganic materials by evaluating and transforming a subset of the
crystal structure data within the NIST Metals Structural Database for inclusion
into the FIZ/NIST Inorganic Crystal Structure Database.
-To enable database interoperability by designing and relating representations
and conventions for crystallographic space groups for a subset of space groups
and entries from the Metals database.
-To enable integration of crystal-structure databases into diffraction
measurement instrumentation by direct interactions with the user community and
instrument and software vendors in order to effect a large and positive economic
impact.
Background:
Components and devices used in a broad
spectrum of technology sectors, e.g., healthcare, communications, energy, and
electronics, are manufactured from crystalline inorganic materials. To meet the
demands for increased device functionality and decreased manufacturing costs,
advanced materials with new or improved properties and optimized processing
schemes are continually being developed. Examples of multi-million dollar
industries driven by materials advances are microelectronics (Si-based devices),
automotive (Pt-alloy catalytic converters), aerospace (ultra-light alloys and
composites), solid state lighting (GaN-based devices), and prosthetic devices
(ceramic dental crowns).
Development of advanced inorganic materials necessarily begins with the
preparation and identification of the constituent chemical and crystallographic
phases. An estimated 20,000 X-ray diffractometers and a comparable number of
electron microscopes are used daily in materials research and development
laboratories for this purpose. Crystalline phases can be identified by their
characteristic X-ray, neutron, and electron diffraction patterns by
pattern-matching against crystal structure data already determined for phases
known to form in a chemical system. Modern, automated diffraction instruments
generate large amounts of experimental diffraction data that are compared
against information contained in or calculated from crystal structure databases
to make phase identifications.
Rapid, unambiguous identification of crystalline phases by diffraction requires
comprehensive, accurate, and reliable crystal structure databases that can be
quickly and easily searched. As different diffraction techniques and instruments
generate data with different content the databases need to be integrated easily
into a wide variety of instrument platforms. In addition, crystal structure
databases obtained from different sources, or that contain different information
relevant to particular materials classes, or that use different representations
of information for historical or materials class-specific reasons, need to
interoperate. Such interoperability is also essential if the databases are to be
easily extensible in terms of new phases or new information fields. Finally, the
form of crystal structure databases needs to be such that they can interoperate
easily with other materials information databases, for example those containing
thermodynamic stability data or materials property data.
Hence, crystal structure databases are central to the core materials science and
engineering linkages of processing-structure-properties. Establishing these
linkages via crystal structure databases that can be integrated easily into a
wide range of measurement platforms and that can interoperate with other
structural and non-structural materials databases is critical to manufacturing
of advanced components and devices.
Although many materials databases have been built—the internet and personal
computers (PCs) provide facile and robust delivery and search
mechanisms—information in diverse databases is not uniform or readily combined
due to the historical evolution and variable adoption of crystallographic
conventions and standards. The variety of scientific and physical
representations used in different crystal structure databases poses significant
barriers to access by non-experts and to realization of the full benefits of
communications and computing power. This circumstance persists in spite of
numerous standards activities and acknowledgement of the benefits of
interoperability.
|